What Money Doesn’t Let You Say

There were days as a young bambino when I used to fall asleep in my spaghetti. A simpler time indeed, I imagine those were not the same days as those when fear and confusion waltzed through our kitchen, sampling the Sunday pasta sauce.

Where did they come from, these creatures of emotion? The wooden spoon my grandma used to threaten a smack on the bottom was one thing, but the arguments at home were another.

Neither side of my family comes from generations before who had it particularly easy; however, I generally experienced positive family dynamics in my early years. This was despite some serious mental health struggles and trauma that occurred within one of my parents and their side of the family, of which I have only become intimate with in the last ~decade. Part of their struggle has dealt with money and how their siblings have behaved regarding a modest inheritance.

What I’ve come to understand from this experience is that, whether it was active controversy or ignorance, it was the symptom of the absence of any container in which the true things could be said without consequence.

May is Mental Health Awareness Month, and while the public conversation around mental health has widened considerably, it has moved unevenly. In spaces where significant wealth is present, a specific kind of reticence tends to persist. Money builds its own grammar over time, and that grammar has words for asset classes and succession and stewardship, and very few words for the interior experience of the people navigating all of it.

———

Money seems to have a way of making absence permanent. People inside a family love each other; they try. The systems families build around wealth are designed to coordinate decisions, not to hold the interior experience of the people making them. Nobody builds a charter to ask what it costs you to sit inside it. Have you seen an investment policy statement that leaves room for grief, or ambivalence, or fear?

When left to their own devices, those parts find other exits, presenting themselves as problems with numbers associated with them. They surface as conflict over an allocation that was never really about the allocation. Or maybe as those who disengage entirely from the family, like I just heard another example of last week.

This is not exclusive to families of wealth. The pattern my own family navigated had nothing to do with family offices or governance documents. But in families where significant capital is present, the structures built to manage money become, over time, the structures that manage the still air between family members, too. Today, governance encodes what you’re willing to say in the room. What is not said remains, but it goes somewhere the document simply can’t reach.

What money specifically doesn’t let you say tends to follow a recognizable shape, even across families that look nothing alike on paper.

It doesn’t let you say that things aren’t fair from your point of view. Whatever the fairness feels like, it could make you become “the ungrateful one”. Your opinions matter; reconsider thoughts that usually don’t get a sentence or foot in the door to open up the conversation.

It doesn’t easily let you say that the money arrived before you had a self to receive it, and that the weight of continuity settled in before you had the foundation to carry it. Where do your obligations stand when this also includes inherited trauma, personal aspirations, divorce? Know that this disorientation is very real, and it does not resolve by reading the charter more carefully.

It doesn’t let you say that you grieve things that the money replaced. The simplicity of falling asleep in your spaghetti. The life that might have existed without the wounds, the liquidity event, or the inheritance. Grief, it turns out, does not require poverty. It requires loss, and money produces losses that come with no acknowledged language or legitimate occasion to mourn.

It doesn’t let you say that you’re afraid. Less so in a measured, manageable way, more in a way that sometimes makes decisions feel impossible. The paralysis that reads as deliberation from the outside is sometimes just fear, wearing nicer threads.

———

What the research on money and psychological well-being has shown is that inherited wealth without a container for meaning tends to produce anxiety, identity confusion, and a loneliness that is difficult to name precisely because it arrives alongside privilege. The restraint that surrounds it doesn’t protect anyone. It’s like leaving your Sunday sauce without a lid; the counter finds the droplets of tomato whether you’re watching or not.

Mental health awareness, at its most useful, is about the recognition that these experiences are real, that they are common, and that the absence of language for them is itself a cost. But children growing up inside that pedagogy don’t experience it as absence. It is experienced as instruction that these things are too dangerous, too complex to say out loud. That lesson travels.

This month is about whether anyone has ever asked what it actually feels like to live inside the map that was drawn without you. It’s about whether the silence has been given any room to become sound.

In my experience, that conversation changes things. It doesn’t require a therapist in the room, though that helps. It requires someone willing to ask the real questions, and a fabric designed to hold the answer.

This is called socioemotional wealth, the non-financial things families are actually protecting when they make decisions that look, from the outside, like poor strategy. You won’t find this on a balance sheet. You’ll notice who stays, who leaves, and what gets said at the table.

If anything here sounds like problems you face, then the work has to happen somewhere other than documents. Birch Road works in the space beneath governance: the values, convictions, and interior life of families building something meant to last.

References

Socioemotional Wealth and Business Risks in Family-controlled Firms

Enhancing Family Investment Governance: Mediation as a Proactive Strategy

Why Values and Early Conversations Matter When Talking About Wealth

Previous
Previous

The Stranger You'll Become

Next
Next

Who Drew the Map?